R O A
 VIEW ROA 807 
GO

807-0206 
On the Status of Voiced Stops in Tswana: Against *ND
Authors 
Elizabeth Zsiga Georgetown University <zsigae@georgetown.edu> [Details]
Maria Gouskova New York University <maria.gouskova@nyu.edu> [Details]
One Tlale University of Botswana <tlaleo@mopipi.ub.bw> [Details]
Comment 
In the proceedings of NELS 36, 2006
Length 
14 pp.
Files 
 PDF 3172kb
Abstract 


The phonetically grounded constraint against voiceless stops after nasals (*NC) has diverse and well-attested effects, but some counterexamples have been cited. Tswana reportedly bans not voiceless but voiced stops after nasals ([bata] 'look for,' [mpata] 'look for me'). A closer look at the phonology of Tswana and a phonetic study suggests that this description is not accurate. For some speakers, no stops are ever voiced, including post-nasal stops. For others, the consonants in question turn out to be not stops but voiced sonorants, which become stops after nasals. Phonologically, the distribution of Tswana obstruents is governed by the interaction of well-known and independently motivated constraints on voicing in obstruents, positional faithfulness to word-initial position, and a process of post-nasal fortition. The study shows that Tswana provides no evidence against *NC.
Keywords 
 grounded constraints, laboratory phonology, voicing, *NC, post-nasal, Tswana
Area 
 Phonology, Phonetics
Type 
 Conference Proceedings Chapter
 JUMP TO GO  
 Item Display:



R O A