|
Abstract
|
THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE ENGLISH LEXICON
Jonathan B. Alcantara, Ph.D.
Cornell University 1998
This study provides an analysis of stress assignment and vowel alter-
nation in the Latinate vocabulary of English, using the mechanisms of
Optimality Theory to express the entire phonology, including lexical
information, through the medium of the constraint hierarchy.
Generative solutions depend crucially upon the underlying lexical
forms which feed the grammar. A computational study of the English
lexicon has been undertaken, identifying the distribution of stress,
syllable weight and vowel length throughout the English lexicon. Forms
have been classified on morphological and prosodic grounds, and com-
parative pattern frequencies have been calculated. This reveals a
series of majority and minority patterns, each with significant dis-
tributions, rather than a large set of regular forms with a residue of
exceptions.
The majority patterns are enforced by prosodic constraints, while the
minority stress patterns can also be accounted for, without recourse
to unstructured exception marking, by proposing additional structure
for their underlying forms. Such structure is restricted to constitu-
ents already found in the grammar. The distribution of vowel quantity
in the data suggests that long vowels seen in alternating forms should
be understood as resulting from a morphologically conditioned vowel
lengthening. Reassessing these forms as underlyingly short accounts
for both vowel alternation and certain otherwise inexplicable stress
retractions. Previously exceptional forms, which failed to "shorten",
are hence understandable as underlyingly long. Stress in morphologic-
ally complex forms is treated via subcategorization constraints, and
all stress and vowel alternation patterns are accounted for with a
single constraint hierarchy.
To account for the now small residue of exceptional forms, such as
suppletive stems or irregular allomorphs, a new conception of the lex-
icon within OT is proposed. Morpheme selection is understood to be
governed by lexical selection constraints. While "regular" forms re-
sult from the interaction of generally applicable constraints, excep-
tions are enforced by high-ranking specific constraints, which take
complex structures as arguments. The contrast between general and
specific constraints can be used to explain competing trends within
the lexicon, such as type vs. token frequency. This proposal moves the
entire grammar into the realm of the constraint hierarchy, and allows
for a principled evaluation metric.
The author welcomes feedback at jba@nuance.com
|
|