R O A
 VIEW ROA 562 
GO

562-1102 
Arguing Optimality
Author 
Alan Prince Rutgers University <prince@ruccs.rutgers.edu> [Details]
Comment 
To appear in Carpenter, Coetzee, & de Lacy, eds. Papers in Optimality Theory II. http://www.umass.edu/linguist/GLSA/
Length 
33 pp.
Supersedes 
ROA#376
Files 
 PDF 314kb
Abstract 


Ranking and optimality are based on pairwise comparisons between a desired optimum and its competitors. The 'comparative tableau' identifies the elements that figure in the ranking arguments derived from such comparisons. Precisely keyed to the logic of the theory, comparative representation makes it straightforward to present and evaluate ranking claims; to find redundancies, non-obvious consequences, and contradictions in sets of ranking arguments; to employ the constraint demotion algorithms; to efficiently determine universal suboptimal status; and to assess the explanatory role of individual constraints in particular analyses.

....
This paper revises Prince 2000:ROA-376, itself a revision of Prince 1998:ROA-288.
Keywords 
 ranking argument, inconsistency, harmonic bounding, constraint demotion
Area 
 Formal Analysis
Type 
 Manuscript
 JUMP TO GO  
 Item Display:



R O A