|
Abstract
|
The Role of the Listener in the Historical Phonology
of Spanish and Portuguese: An Optimality-Theoretic Account
David Eric Holt, M.S.
Mentor: Alfonso Morales-Front, Ph.D.
[Readers: Thomas J. Walsh and Elizabeth Zsiga]
[Defended 10 July 1997; Deposited August 1997]
Note: Proper viewing of all phonetic symbols requires the
installation of the font SILDoulosIPA.
File 1 includes all front matter (title page, abstract,
acknowledgements, table of contents, definition of language terms),
introduction, Chapter 1. (54 pp)
File 2 includes Chapter 2. (36 pp)
File 3 includes Chapter 3 and an appendix. (38 pp)
File 4 includes Chapter 4 and two appendices. (77 pp)
File 5 includes Chapter 5 and references. (19 pp)
Abstract:
In this dissertation I study the application to historical sound
change of a constraint-based approach to phonology. I employ
Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993, McCarthy and Prince
1993a,b) in the analysis of the principal changes in syllable
structure that developed from Latin to Spanish and Portuguese. I
argue that historical sound change is driven by the incorporation
of phonetic factors into phonology for reasons of lexicon and grammar
optimization, and show that the role of perception and
reinterpretation by the listener is crucial in achieving this
optimization. Additionally, reanalysis of underlying forms may have
profound effects on the constraint hierarchy of the grammar, leading
to the step-wise rise of markedness constraints versus faithfulness
constraints.
Furthermore, several steps in the historical development of certain
phenomena of syllable structure and phonological/phonetic forms are
best understood as resulting from effects of perception and
(re-)interpretation by the hearer.
Chapter 1 discusses the need for theoretical approaches to historical
change in additional to traditional ones, introduces theoretical
machinery (Optimality Theory, lexicon optimization, moraic theory and
its relation to sonority) and reviews previous OT approaches to
variation and change.
In Chapter 2 I show that reanalysis by the listener of phonetic
differences leads to loss of vowel length distinctions in Late Latin,
initiating massive changes in the distribution of long segments: a
constraint disfavoring moraic consonants begins to rise, first
reducing obstruent geminates and vocalizing syllable-final velars.
Chapter 3 continues to explore results of the loss of phonological
vowel length. I first treat the evolution of the seven-vowel system of
Late Spoken Latin, and argue that reanalysis of the Latin Stress Rule
led to vowel lengthening. Later developments lead to diphthongization
of stressed open mid vowels in Old Spanish. I then show that geminate
consonants are progressively simplified, with the sonorants now being
affected. Reduction leads to /n, l/ in Galician/Portuguese, but
palatal /N, L/ in Old Spanish, where merger with Latin /n, l/ would
have resulted.
Chapter 4 shows that the listener may (mis)interpret one sound for a
less marked one based on great acoustic similarity. In the development
of Latin _Cl_ clusters to Spanish, Galician and Portuguese _-ch-_, I
argue that voicing assimilation yielded a cluster that was interpreted
as [tS]. The Uniformity Condition is also reconsidered.
Chapter 5 summarizes the results of this study and offers several
conclusions about historical sound change in Optimality Theory.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Definitions of Language Terms xiii
Introduction 1
Chapter 1: Theoretical considerations 6
1.0 Introduction 6
1.1 Historical change 6
1.2 Historical change in generative phonology 7
1.3 Theoretical assumptions 10
1.3.1 Optimality Theory 11
1.3.2 Lexicalization and lexicon optimization in
Optimality Theory and previous models 18
1.3.3 Moraic theory 25
1.4 Previous OT approaches to variation and historical
change 28
1.4.1 OT approaches to variation 28
1.4.1.1 Zubritskaya (1994) 28
1.4.2.2 Anttila (1995) 30
1.4.2 OT approaches to historical sound change 32
1.4.2.1 Jacobs (1994, 1995) 32
1.4.2.2 Hutton (1996) 33
1.4.2.3 Gess (1996) 37
1.4.2.4 Summary 37
1.5 Directions for the present study 38
Notes to Chapter 1 39
Chapter 2: The evolution of Latin vowel length and
geminate obstruents 41
2.0 Introduction 41
2.1 Distinctive vowel length in Latin 42
2.1.1 Vowel quantity in Latin 45
2.1.2 The role of phonetics and the listener in
eliminating vowel length 49
2.2 Consequences of the loss of contrastively long vowels 53
2.3 The sonority hierarchy and *LONG 55
2.4 The rise of *C-mora in the loss of the moraic status
of obstruents 61
2.5 Summary and conclusions 70
Notes to Chapter 2 72
Chapter 3: The evolution of Late Spoken Latin /E, O/ and
geminate sonorants 77
3.0 Introduction 77
3.1 The phenomena to be analyzed in the history of
Hispano-Romance 77
3.2 Reanalysis of the Latin Stress Rule: Consequences for
Hispano-Romance 80
3.2.1 The effects of STRESS-TO-WEIGHT in
Hispano-Romance 81
3.2.1.1 Vowel lengthening in Hispano-Romance 81
3.2.1.2 Diphthongization of /E, O/ in Old
Spanish 84
3.3 Evolution of Latin geminate sonorants /nn, ll/ in
Hispano-Romance 91
3.3.1 Simplification of /nn, ll/ in Galician/
Portuguese 94
3.3.2 Palatalization of /nn, ll/ in Old Spanish 94
3.4 Summary constraints, rankings and classes of moraic
segments in Hispano-Romance 100
3.5 General summary and conclusions 103
Notes to Chapter 3 106
Appendix to Chapter 3: Coarticulated nasal and lateral codas in
Andalusian and Caribbean Spanish 110
Chapter 4: Comprehension, reinterpretation and the
Uniformity Condition 115
4.0 Introduction 115
4.0.1 Data 116
4.0.2 Previous accounts 118
4.0.3 Principal issues of this chapter 122
4.1 A unified approach 124
4.1.0 Outline of the present analysis 124
4.1.1 Analysis of Sp. ll, Gal./Ptg. _lh_ 125
4.1.2 Analysis of Sp., Gal./Ptg. _-ch-_ 134
4.1.3 Analysis of Gal./Ptg. _ch-_ 142
4.1.4 Analysis of remaining data from medial position 145
4.2 The listener as a source of sound change 150
4.3 Summary and conclusions 152
Notes to Chapter 4 155
First Appendix to Chapter 4:
On the phonetic plausibility of _Cl_ > tS 162
Notes to first Appendix to Chapter 4 178
Second Appendix: Other cases of the 'Uniformity Condition' 179
Notes to second Appendix to Chapter 4 192
Chapter 5: Summary and conclusions 193
References 197
The computer file version:
In preparation of the computer file version I occasionally found it
necessary to make minimal changes in formatting. For instance, not all
page breaks are the same, and consequently there may be slight
differences in page numbering between the Table of Contents and the
computer file version.
|
|