| ROA: | 213 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Consonant Harmony in Child Language: An Optimality-theoretic Account |
| Authors: | Heather Goad |
| Comment: | |
| Length: | 23 |
| Abstract: | Consonant Harmony in Child Language: An Optimality-theoreticAccount Heather Goad Department of Linguistics, McGill University goad@leacock.lan.mcgill.ca Ms. dated 1995. Currently in press in S.J. Hannahs & M. Young-Scholten, _Focus on phonological acquisition_. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113-142. Abstract An analysis is provided of the consonant harmony (CH) patterns exhibited in the speech of one child, Amahl at Stage 1 (data from Smith 1973). It is argued that the standard rule-based analysis which involves Coronal underspecification and planar segregation is not tenable. First, the data reveal an underspecification paradox: coronal consonants are targets for CH and should thus be unspecified for Coronal. However, they also trigger harmony, in words where the targets are liquids. Second, the data are not consistent with planar segregation, as one harmony pattern is productive beyond the point when Amahl's grammar satisfies the requirements for planar segregation (set forth in McCarthy 1989). An alternative analysis is proposed within the constraint-based framework of Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993). It is argued that CH follows from the relative ranking of constraints which parse place features and those which align features with the edges of the prosodic word. With the constraints responsible for parsing and aligning Labial and Dorsal ranked above those responsible for parsing and aligning Coronal, the dual behaviour of coronals can be captured. The effect of planar segregation follows from other independently motivated constraints which force alignment to be satisfied through copying of segmental material, not through spreading. Keywords: first language acquisition, consonant harmony, underspecification paradox |
| Type: | Paper/tech report |
| Area/Keywords: | |
| Article: | Version 1 |